Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

SYNTHESIS OF BIOGAS – A REVIEW

S.V.A.R Sastry

Abstract


Energy is universally recognized as one of the most important inputs for economic growth and human development. Every day, in our walks of life we come across food, vegetable wastes and other organic wastes that have huge potential to uplift the society in a better way, when these are transformed into useful bioenergy. To produce bioenergy from biomass one of the better options is to utilize these potential wastes to transform it into biogas. Today, the entire world is looking for different alternative fuels. Biogas is one of the good alternative fuel, energy rich and is well suited as domestic fuel, for heating purposes and power generation. The sources available for the production of biogas are fruit, vegetable wastes and agricultural residues. Biogas from such solid wastes primarily constitutes of methane, carbon dioxide and other trace gases. It is a clean fuel with a calorific value between 5000 to 5500 kcal/kg. There are two methods available for the production of biogas from organic wastes. They are dry processes and the wet processes. The dry processes include combustion and pyrolysis, whereas the wet processes include anaerobic digestion, gasification and fermentation. Key words: Biogas, Batch process, Biomass, Wet process, Anaerobic digestion

Full Text:

PDF

References


P. Parameswaran, B.E. Rittmann, Feasibility of anaerobic co-digestion of pig waste and paper sludge, Bioresource Technology, 124 (2012), pp 163-168.

S.V.A.R.Sastry & Ch.V.R. Murthy , Sustainable Energy For Eco-Friendly Development, i-manager’s Journal on Future Engineering and Technology, 8 (2013), pp 1-8.

S.V.A.R. Sastry & Ch.V.R. Murthy, Opportunities and issues for second generation Biofuels production in India, i-manager’s Journal on Future Engineering and Technology, 10 (2014), pp 27-34.

G. Thompson, J. Swain, M. Kay, C. Forster, The treatment of pulp and paper mill effluent: a review, Bioresource Technology, 77 (2001), pp. 275-286.

Prajuli, Prakash. 2011. Biogas measurement techniques and the associated errors. Masters Thesis Department of Biological and Environmental Science, University of Jyväskylä, Finlandia.

D. Pokhrel, T. Viraraghavan, Treatment of pulp and paper mill wastewater: a review, Science of The Total Environment, 333 (2004), pp. 37-58.

Chonkor P.K, Microbial Ecology during Anarodic Fermentation of cellulose waste Materials in S.K.Vyas, Grewal, N.S (Ed), Biogas Technology USG Publisher, Ludhiana, India.1983, 21-26.

M.C. Monte, E. Fuente, A. Blanco, C. Negro, Waste management from pulp and paper production in the European Union, Waste Manag., 29 (2009), pp. 293-308.

Y. Cao, A. Pawlowski, Sewage sludge-to-energy approaches based on anaerobic digestion and pyrolysis: Brief overview and energy efficiency assessment, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16 (2012), pp. 1657-1665.

S.V.A.R.Sastry & Ch.V.R. Murthy, Sustainable Development: The Current Indian Scenario, International Journal of Renewable Energy and Its Commercialization, 2 (2016), pp 8-15.

S.V.A.R. Sastry, Cow and its role in the sustainable development, International Journal of Agrochemistry, 3 (2017), pp 1-5.

D. Bolzonella, L. Innocenti, F. Cecchi, Biological nutrient removal wastewater treatments and sewage sludge anaerobic mesophilic digestion performances, WatSciTechnol, 46 (10) (2002), pp. 199-208.

E. Marañón, L. Castrillón, G. Quiroga, Y. Fernández-Nava, L. Gómez, M.M. García, Co-digestion of cattle manure with food waste and sludge to increase biogas production, Waste Management, 32 (2012), pp. 182-1825.

Y. Lin, D. Wang, Q. Li, M. Xiao, Mesophilic batch anaerobic co-digestion of pulp and paper sludge and monosodium glutamate waste liquor for methane production in a bench-scale digester, Bioresource Technology, 102 (2011), pp. 3673-78.

R.S. Soetopo, S. Purwati, W. Krisna Aditya, Produksi Biogas Sebagai Hasil Pengolahan Limbah Lumpur Industri Kertas dengan Proses Digestasi Anaerobik Dua-Tahap, Jurnal Riset Industri, 4 (3) (2010), pp. 11-20.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.