Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Review of Chemical Fingerprinting Analysis

Manoj Kumar Chauhan

Abstract


A specific pattern that can be used to detect a contaminant, medication, toxin, or even other substance in a lab test using specialist analytical methods like mass spectroscopy or X-ray spectroscopy. Iodine, cyanoacrylate, silver nitrate, and ninhydrin are the four main compounds forensic scientists use to identify and gather fingerprints. These compounds cause the fingerprint to change color in response to components in the print, such as sweat and oil, making it easier for analysts to read. For the quality control, a quick and trustworthy HPLC fingerprinting method was created and approved. By methodically comparing chromatograms using specialized analytical tools, the viability, and benefits of the employed HPLC fingerprint were confirmed for its similarity evaluation. Fingerprinting analysis revealed many types of results. The outcomes showed that the HPLC fingerprint can be successfully used to evaluate the quality and to identify as a distinctive differentiating technique integrating similar assessment and quantitative analysis. The term “chemical fingerprinting” refers to a group of methods that use a sample’s chemical makeup to determine where it came from
(including a contaminant). Petroleum biomarkers are commonly utilized for this in geochemical and forensic oil spill identification. For the quantitative analysis of five active chemicals as well as chemical fingerprint characterization, a procedure based on ultra-performance liquid chromatography with a diode array detector was devised. By methodically comparing chromatograms with the advised analytical software, the viability, and benefits of the applied UPLC fingerprint were confirmed for its similarity evaluation.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Douglas GS, Emsbo-Mattingly SD, Stout SA, Uhler AD, McCarthy KJ. Chemical fingerprinting methods. Introduction Environ Forensics. 2007 Jan 1;2.

Stout SA, Wang Z. Chemical fingerprinting methods and factors affecting petroleum fingerprints in the environment. In: Standard handbook oil spill environmental forensics. Academic Press; 2016 Jan 1. p. 61–129.

Zanetti D, Capkun S, Danev B. Types and origins of fingerprints. In: Digital fingerprinting. New York: Springer; 2016. p. 5–29.

Jain AK, Feng J, Nagar A, Nandakumar K. On matching latent fingerprints. In2008 IEEE Comput Soc Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops 2008 Jun 23. IEEE Publications. p. 1–8.

Sodhi GS, Kaur J. Powder method for detecting latent fingerprints: a review. Forensic Sci Int. 2001 Sep 1;120(3):172–6. doi: 10.1016/s0379–0738(00)00465–5.

Huynh C, Brunelle E, Halámková L, Agudelo J, Halámek J. Forensic identification of gender from fingerprints. Anal Chem. 2015 Nov 17;87(22):11531–6. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.5b03323.

Wang M, Li M, Yu A, Zhu Y, Yang M, Mao C. Fluorescent nanomaterials for the development of latent fingerprints in forensic sciences. Adv Funct Mater. 2017 Apr;27(14):1606243. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201606243.

Swaminathan A, Wu M, Liu KJR. Digital image forensics via intrinsic fingerprints. IEEE Trans. Inform. Forensic Secur. 2008 Feb 12;3(1):101–17. doi: 10.1109/TIFS.2007.916010.

Zhang W, Kosiorek DA, Brodeur AN. Application of Structured‐Light 3‐D scanning to the documentation of plastic fingerprint impressions: A quality comparison with traditional photography. J Forensic Sci. 2020 May;65(3):784–90. doi: 10.1111/1556–4029.14249.

Frégeau CJ, Germain O, Fourney RM. Fingerprint enhancement revisited and the effects of blood enhancement chemicals on subsequent Profiler Plus™ fluorescent short tandem repeat DNA analysis of fresh and aged bloody fingerprints. J Forensic Sci. 2000 Mar 1;45(2):354–80.

Hazarika P, Russell DA. Advances in fingerprint analysis. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2012 Apr 10;51(15):3524–31. doi: 10.1002/anie.201104313.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.